Search for: "Michael Martin v. State" Results 561 - 580 of 756
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2010, 3:26 am by SHG
When the Supremes decided in Maryland v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 6:33 am by thejaghunter
Kendall, Honolulu, HI ET3 Martin J. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:16 am by Erin Miller
Briefly: At Concurring Opinions, Robert Schapiro comments on the potential implications that the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:12 pm by jefhenninger
Spears, 36, of Neptune, and a former corrections officer at East Jersey State Prison in Woodbridge, Michael T. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am by INFORRM
The Legal Satyricon blog has a post about United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Murphy v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:33 pm by PJ Blount
Lockheed Martin Corp., p.197 # Michael Lyons, Reasonably Precise Specifications and the Military Contractor Defense—The Eleventh Circuit Misapplies the Boyle Test: Brinson v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:49 pm by legalinformatics
Daniel Martin Katz, Michael Bommarito, and Jonathan Zelner, all of the University of Michigan Center for the Study of Complex Systems, and Professor James H. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am by James Bickford
Frommert, which Martine Cicconi recapped over the weekend at this blog. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:44 am
Retirement Board’s failure to make an independent evaluation of an individual’s application for disability retirement fatal to the processSchlesinger v New York City Employees' Retirement System, 2010 NY Slip Op 20123, Decided on April 7, 2010, Supreme Court, Kings County, Judge Martin SchneierIn this Article 78 action Michael Schlesinger asked the court to annul, the action of the [New York City Employees’ Retirement System] denying his application… [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
SETTLEMENTS EPA to Allow States Address Rising Ocean Acidity. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 4:02 pm
Tiffany's CEO Michael J Kowalski said in a statement that Tiffany is "disappointed" with the ruling and may appeal to the US Supreme Court.The AmeriKat thanks the IPKat's friend and esteemed trade mark blogger, Martin Schwimmer for alerting the Kat to the ruling. [read post]