Search for: "Michael Sullivan" Results 561 - 580 of 1,521
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
But the  proposition that they would cease buying charge-off bank debt altogether is not plausible, especially when the collection of charged-off consumer debt is their sole line of business and the very reason for their existence.MORE COMMENTARY OF THE DANGER-GLOOM-IF-NOT-DOOM GENRE INTEREST EXPORTATION AND PREEMPTION: "MADDEN'S" IMPACT ON NATIONAL BANKS, THE SECONDARY CREDIT MARKET, AND P2P LENDING Michael Marvin Columbia Law Review Vol. 116, No. 7 (NOVEMBER… [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
But the  proposition that they cease buying charge-off bank debt altogether is not plausible, especially when the collection of charged-off consumer debt is their sole line of business and the very reason for their existence.MORE COMMENTARY OF THE DANGER-GLOOM-IF-NOT-DOOM GENRE INTEREST EXPORTATION AND PREEMPTION: "MADDEN'S" IMPACT ON NATIONAL BANKS, THE SECONDARY CREDIT MARKET, AND P2P LENDING Michael Marvin Columbia Law Review Vol. 116, No. 7 (NOVEMBER 2016),… [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:16 am by Ronald Collins
Sullivan, “a classic example of non-originalist interpretation”; and the various “extravagant assertions of congressional power. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:00 am by Dennis Crouch
At Quinn Emanuel, it is Kathleen Sullivan and Sheila Birnbaum. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 8:34 am by Brooke
Frier.The Los Angeles Review of Books includes a review of Michael Kazin's War Against War: The American Fight for Peace, 1914-1918..In the London Review of Books is a review of Thomas Laquer's The Work of the Dead: A Cultural History of Mortal Remains.At Public Books Anne Trubek's The History and Uncertain Future of Handwriting is reviewed.Finally, at The American Prospect Richard Rothstein's The Color of Law: The Forgotten Story of How Our… [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:00 am by David Forscey
Notwithstanding some media reports suggesting that the Michael Flynn “unmasking” imbroglio could cause the White House to change its official position, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats says that the IC is supporting 702 reauthorization with only one change: making the law permanent, and ending the recurring debates over the program’s merits. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
Family Law Three-Card Monte – Limitations to Remedies Concerning Military Pension Benefits Being Shifted to VA Disability Benefits Under Cassinelli and Howell By: Michael C. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 11:59 am by Helen Klein Murillo, Benjamin Wittes
Georgetown Law Professor (and former federal prosecutor) Julie O’Sullivan argues that the obstruction statutes—”incompletely defined, redundant, and internally inconsistent”—are emblematic of larger problems in the U.S. criminal code. [read post]
31 May 2017, 6:26 am by Jim Sedor
’s Legislators Continues to Miff Critics” by Angela Couloumbis (Philadelphia Inquirer) and Karen Langley for Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Campaign Finance Arizona: “Court: Former Attorney General Tom Horne’s rights violated in campaign case” by Yvonne Wingett Sanchez for Arizona Republic Missouri: “Candidate Spending Gets Little Scrutiny under Missouri Ethics Laws” by Ellen Cagle for Southeast Missourian Washington: “Citizen Watchdog Peppers Washington… [read post]
31 May 2017, 3:34 am by Liz Dunshee
Peikin, a graduate of Harvard Law School, leads the criminal defense and investigations group at Sullivan & Cromwell. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am by INFORRM
On 19 May 2017, in the case of Dreyer v O’Sullivan, a psychiatrist was granted a without notice harassment injunction against an ex-patient who has been harassing him. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 19 May 2017, in the case of Dreyer v O’Sullivan, a psychiatrist was been granted a without notice harassment injunction against an ex-patient who has been harassing him. [read post]
17 May 2017, 5:58 am by Staci Zaretsky
" Former FBI director James Comey was writing memos detailing his conversations with Donald Trump to document what he believed were the president's improper attempts to influence the Michael Flynn investigation. [read post]