Search for: "Mitchell v State" Results 561 - 580 of 2,024
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2014, 7:48 am by Katharine Alexander, Olswang LLP
    [1] HRH Prince Abdulaziz Bin Mishal Bin Abdulaziz Al Saud v Apex Global Management Limited, Faisal Abdel Hafiz Almhairat [2014] EWCA Civ 1106, paragraph 21 [2] Ibid, paragraph 32 [3] Ibid, paragraph 46 [4] Ibid, paragraph 83 [5] Irwin Mitchell and HowardKennedyFsi replaced on Saudi Prince Supreme Court Fight, The Lawyer, 9 September 2014 [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:42 am
Bonnette v Long Island College Hosp., 3 NY3d 281 (2004); Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224 (1984). [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 5:15 am by David Smith
In Chohan v McManus [2008] EWCA Civ 1657 the Court of Appeal was considering what constituted occupation of premises for the purposes of an Assured Tenancy. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 5:15 am by David Smith
In Chohan v McManus [2008] EWCA Civ 1657 the Court of Appeal was considering what constituted occupation of premises for the purposes of an Assured Tenancy. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
Kleinberger (pictured), Emeritus Professor of Law at William Mitchell College of Law in St. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 7:16 am by Lee Tankle
Recently, Judge Mitchell Goldberg of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania issued a decision in Verderame v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Finchett-Maddock & Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, To Open Up: A performative rewriting of Pendragon v United Kingdom (1998) 27 EHRR CD 179 , (Helen Dancer, Bonnie Holligan and Helena Howe (eds.) [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 119282 (ED WI, Sept. 8, 2015), a Wisconsin federal district court dismissed a complaint by a Pagan Wiccan inmate that he did not get his religious text, Book of Shadows, while in temporary lockup.In Mitchell v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:45 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 12303, Jan. 6, 2016) and dismissed a claim by an inmate (a rabbi) that his kosher diet requirements were not adequately accommodated.In Mitchell v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Members appealed the district court's ruling to the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.The Circuit Court rejected the arguments advanced by the Members that they entitled to legislative immunity explaining that "because the Board Members are not parties to this action and have not raised a colorable claim of official immunity," they are not within the ambit of the Doctrine.Citing Mitchell v Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, in which the… [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 7:03 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
State, 975 So. 2d 593, 595 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (quoting Mitchell v. [read post]