Search for: "Motion to Quash Subpoena"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,082
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2012, 11:01 am
The anonymous reviewer hired a lawyer and moved to quash the subpoena to protect his identity. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:50 pm
Include Detailed Evidence In Your Motion To Quash Simply put, you need evidence and detailed arguments to support your motion to quash. [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:43 am
Today we have filed a motion to quash the subpoena, arguing that the union president has not come close to meeting the test for enforcing subpoenas to represent anonymous Internet posters. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:51 am
App. 3rd): Miccosukee v Bermudez COA opinion An excerpt: The Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, a federally recognized Indian Tribe, petitions this Court for certiorari relief from an order denying the Tribe’s Motion for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoena for Deposition issued to Tribal Officer and General Counsel Bernardo Roman III, Esquire. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:51 am
The defense filed a motion to quash, the investigator hired an attorney, and the morning my post appeared I got a call from someone in the prosecutor’s office. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:20 pm
Does 1-13, that Verizon had turned over the identities of its subscribers to the plaintiff's counsel five (5) days PRIOR to the subpoena return date, and three (3) days prior to the Court's order staying enforcement of the subpoena, thus preventing the court from ruling on the pending motion to quash (PDF) prior to disclosure.Plaintiff's lawyer, instead of immediately advising the Court, waited ten (10) days, and then calmly made what he called a… [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:53 pm
And in that case, the court denied the defendant’s attempt to quash a subpoena on grounds that: (1) defendant did not have standing for the motion to quash because criminal defendants (in New York at least) do not have standing to quash a subpoena issued to a third party (the court analogized to prior rulings regarding subpoenas to banks); and (2) the defendant didn’t have the right to “intervene” in the action… [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:37 am
bit.ly/JQaISt (Gardere) Twitter Seeks To Quash Order Requiring Production of Account Holder’s User Information, Tweets – bit.ly/IMCMqV (K&L Gates) Was Samsung Deal a Watershed for Machine Translation in FTC Second Requests? [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:31 am
Gray moved for a protective order and Graham and Evans moved to quash the subpoenas, all claiming that they were protected by legislative immunity. [read post]
12 May 2012, 10:48 am
Does Copyright Doe Defendant Can’t Quash Disclosure Subpoena Anonymously—Hard Drive Productions v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:52 am
Harris then filed a motion “to quash the subpoena in his own right or to intervene in the proceedings to quash the subpoena. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:00 am
After the court granted the application, Nokia moved to quash the resulting subpoena. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:00 am
Now it’s Twitter’s turn to file a motion to quash the court’s order. [read post]
10 May 2012, 10:47 am
The accounting firm also argued that the Commission should be required to serve the subpoena under the Hague Convention (D&T Shanghai also moved to quash the subpoena for the same reason). [read post]
9 May 2012, 4:05 pm
The Court denied Harris’ motion to quash the subpoena, concluding that he did not have a “proprietary interest in his Tweets. [read post]
9 May 2012, 11:42 am
Getty Images via @daylifeNew York County Criminal Court Judge Matthew Sciarrino recently declined the defendant's motion to quash a subpoena in People v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 11:36 am
’s motion to quash the court’s order. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:45 pm
The company stepped in with the motion after the account holder lost his own bid to quash the order. [read post]
8 May 2012, 2:10 pm
Indeed, even though Twitter provided notice to the Twitter user in this particular case, and even though he was able to get an attorney to file a motion seeking to quash the subpoena, the court found that the Twitter user did not have legal “standing” to challenge the D.A. [read post]
8 May 2012, 1:56 pm
"If the order stands, Twitter will be put in the untenable position of either providing user communications and account information in response to all subpoenas or attempting to vindicate its users' rights by moving to quash these subpoenas itself—even though Twitter will often know little or nothing about the underlying facts necessary to support their users' argument that the subpoenas may be improper," Twitter's attorneys… [read post]
