Search for: "NON-RECORD CLAIMANTS" Results 561 - 580 of 1,601
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
The Court of Appeal recorded (at p 2132, para 90) the claimants' argument:"The claimant will be concerned [when he first instructs a solicitor] that, by giving instructions...he is not exposing himself to liability for costs. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
A similar approach was taken by the Court of Appeal in Halliday v Creation Consumer Finance Ltd (2013) EWCA Civ 333 in respect of mistakes on a DPA claimant’s credit record, where again nominal damages for financial damages enabled the court to award compensation of £750 for emotional distress. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:45 pm by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
A claimant may only establish title to land owned by another through adverse possession if he can prove his non-permissive use of the land, which is actual, open, notorious, exclusive, and adverse for 20 years. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 2:33 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Not surprisingly, claim professionals do not feel kindly towards insureds or claimants who call and swear at them. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:54 am by INFORRM
It was said that she thought that the Claimant might prefer to pay some money to make the problem go away for good”. [read post]
7 May 2013, 8:53 am
As the judgment records: The Claimants (collectively “Nestec”) are respectively the owner, exclusive licensee and alleged exclusive sub-licensee of European Patent (UK) No 2 103 236 (“the Patent”). [read post]
25 May 2018, 12:21 pm by Kelsey Farish
He is now the president of the Authors Guild and one of the named claimants in the case. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 2:03 pm
  Under FIRNA rules, firms and associated persons are obligated to cooperate with the regulators by talking to the regulators in informal and formal on-the-record interviews when requested, by providing copies of books and records, etc. [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:09 pm by Ron Miller
It is not an uncommon practice in today’s workplace for an employer to require employees to sign some sort of non-compete, non-disclosure, non-solicitation, or confidentiality agreement to protect its competitive position should a former employee secure employment with a competitor. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am by Greg Reed
What is the effect of a claimant’s failure to give timely notice of claim or proof of claim? [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:00 am by Anita Davies, Matrix
This is not to say that if the claimants have a legal right the courts cannot decide it. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am by INFORRM
It is true that much of what I have said is based on recordings and facts which are incontrovertible but, even so, upon closer [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 11:43 am by Anthony Zaller
  Also, co-workers who worked with the claimant are also good witnesses to establish that they always saw the claimant take breaks and never saw them working off the clock. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:31 am by NZB
The accident occurred around 10:30 pm. in an apparently poorly lit or non- illuminated area and during a dreary, rainy or foggy evening. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:50 am by Aimee Czachorowski
As to the first argument, the Court found little evidence in the record to support North River’s assertion that, without Mine Safety’s “engineering” of suits by assigning its rights to tort plaintiffs, claimants would not directly bring suit against North River. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:01 am by emagraken
When an injury claimant attends examination for discovery or trial they are usually subjected to an extensive cross-examination with respect to matters contained in clinical records. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 3:02 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
The employer cannot force the claimant to sign, but non-compliance is not going to help in the long run and may only bolster the fact there is something in the medical past being hidden. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  [How many registered works are non-US works?] [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 10:45 am by Rick St. Hilaire
“According to CBP records for the March 22, 2007 shipment, the country of origin on the Commercial Invoice submitted to CBP was changed from Mongolia to Japan. [read post]