Search for: "New Jersey v. Delaware"
Results 561 - 580
of 750
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
John StuartStephanie Corrigan, University of Delaware Spiritualism and Social Action: Alliances for Social Change in the Early RepublicMark McGarvie, University of Richmond COMMENT: Peter C. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 8:12 am
Kennedy Federal Building - Room 1875Boston, MA 02203Voice phone(617)565-1340FAX (617)565-3809TDD (617)565-1343Region II - New York (New Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands)Michael Carter, Regional ManagerOffice for Civil RightsU.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:53 am
In Lupyan v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:21 am
” Defendant’s parent began using its mark in the US as early as 1911, and defendant/those in privity with it used the mark continuously in Canada and the United States, including New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Florida, Texas, North Carolina, South Carolina, the Rockies, Texas, and Louisiana. [read post]
CMS Vaccine Mandate Takes Effect in 26 States as Fifth Circuit Alters Scope of Nationwide Injunction
16 Dec 2021, 2:28 pm
The impact of the December 15 order from the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals is that the CMS vaccine mandate is currently in effect for the following 26 states: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 10:45 am
Accordingly, the WOTUS Rule is now the controlling law in California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia and Washington. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:17 am
Last May, a similar lawsuit against Wyndham’s directors and officers, which had been filed under seal in February, was unsealed in the District of New Jersey. [read post]
24 Sep 2022, 8:03 am
The decision is yesterday's West 49th St., LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:34 pm
II § 1 Nevada Art. 6 (title); Art. 3 § 1 New Hampshire Art. 18-a & Art. 41 New Jersey Art. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 3:55 pm
In Daskalea v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
Just weeks after the Court’s decision in Murphy, sports wagering has already commenced at casinos and racetracks in New Jersey and Delaware. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am
Bills restricting the use of noncompete provisions are also pending in other states, including Iowa, Maine, Michigan, New Jersey, and Oklahoma. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Zimmmer, Inc., 927 F.2d 124, 129 (2d Cir. 1991) (applying New York law); Phelps v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 7:50 am
California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, DC, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin have similar laws. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:02 am
Jurors also found that J&J warning label information on Risperdal was deceptive.The state’s case centered on drug-safety claims that New Brunswick, New Jersey-based J&J and Janssen made in November 2003 correspondence to about 700,000 doctors across the U.S., including 7,200 in South Carolina.The U.S. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:51 am
Filings have risen 6 percent in Utah and 2 percent in New Jersey. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:30 am
” Bank of United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 8:08 am
Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit (the appellate court responsible for reviewing all federal trial court decisions in Delaware, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey) has rejected that argument. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 2:00 am
Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit (whose decision apply to New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware) has some silver linings for employers—first and foremost, a finding that not all employer communications referencing unions are actionable. [read post]
