Search for: "Nicely v. United States" Results 561 - 580 of 1,412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2021, 7:53 am by Dennis Crouch
Whether the equities lie considerably against granting mandamus, United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 9:00 am by Tim Edgar
  Collection over the air, or outside the United States, generally doesn’t. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:40 am by David Post
  If you’re interested, see chapter 10 (“Governing Cyberspace II: Names”) of my book In Search of Jefferson’s Moose: Notes on the State of Cyberspace for a detailed account. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:49 am by Steven Peck
Second, it allows creditors to proceed against domain names where the registry is located, thus allowing creditors to proceed against domain names in one proceeding and more importantly levy against domain names located abroad (where the registry is located in the United States). [read post]
19 May 2017, 10:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
It also provides a nice comparison of the DTSA and the state-law Uniform Trade Secrets Act.Paul Mersino of Butzel Long in Detroit wrote a nice one-year summary piece in Crain's Detroit. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
  One does not speak here merely of the travails of blocking legislation in the context of the U.S. system of dispute resolution (that is old news and one which the U.S. system has already well internalized in its dispute resolution mechanisms as the Opinion nicely evidences). [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:10 pm by Eric E. Johnson
The full name is the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
United States, 12-862, which asks the Court to overrule Feres v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:09 pm by Eric Biber
  This approach is not unique to the United States – rights of nature legal approaches have been used in New Zealand, Bolivia, and Ecuador. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 5:44 am by Sean Hanover
Petitioner “turned his back” on the gang as a requisite for coming to the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 1:04 pm by Orin S. Kerr
This is the same mistake that the initial Fifth Circuit panel made in United States v. [read post]