Search for: "Novelty, Inc."
Results 561 - 580
of 766
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2011, 3:23 pm
This trend was halted by the United States Supreme Court in the summer of 2002 in Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 2:25 pm
The Application was refused on the grounds of lack of novelty and inventive step and not patentable under S.3 (d). [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 2:25 pm
The Application was refused on the grounds of lack of novelty and inventive step and not patentable under S.3 (d). [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:00 am
Toffutti Brands Inc. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Occlutech (Kluwer Patent Blog) Greece Court of Appeal Thessaloniki: Patent covering ornamental light device lacks novelty and inventive step: Palaiochorinos S.A. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 4:33 pm
Several weeks ago Amazon Technologies, Inc., received United States Patent No. 7,831,439, titled System and method for converting gifts. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:30 am
Signature Financial Group, Inc., which categorically and unceremoniously did away with what had previously been come to be known as the business method exception to patentability. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:11 am
Technical features: The proprietor (Beckman Coulter, Inc.) held that all steps A to E are technical, while the opponent (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) argued that steps B to E relate to pure mathematical operations and thus have to be considered non-technical. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:57 am
Mr Justice Kitchen, sitting in the Court of Appeal with Lord Justice Jacob and Longmore, dismissed the appeal in the case of Softlanding Systems Inc v KDP Software Limited and Unicom Systems Inc ([2010] EWCA Civ 1172) last week. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:55 am
Stein Meat Products, Inc., Opposition No. 91197089 (filed October 25, 2010). [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
Staples, Inc. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:14 pm
Disgusting to the concept that a patent is deserved only for novelty, American law yields little respect for foreign inventions, so the Russians work doesn't count as prior art. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:28 am
Russian Kurier, Inc., 140 F.3d 442, 449 (2d Cir. 1998) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 12:14 pm
Elrac, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:04 pm
Originality does not signify novelty... [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:00 am
Carey Canada Inc. in para. 27 of their Responding Factum, and state that the novelty of a cause of action should not by itself result in it being struck. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:01 am
Augustine’s Spiritual Goods, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 2:25 am
Novelty Inc., 511 F. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 8:42 am
The American Ethicon, Inc. [read post]
