Search for: "OXLEY v. STATE"
Results 561 - 580
of 658
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2007, 12:51 am
But the impact of past decisions may pale in comparison to the Court's resolution, to be made next year, of Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 5:19 am
SEC v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
That other case, Lucia v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:20 am
The Act, however, maintains other investor protections, such as those set forth in Section 501 of the Sarbanes-Oxley, which address potential con [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 5:27 am
The Second Circuit reversed, holding that even though plaintiffs had filed their individual lawsuits prior to the district court’s ruling on class certification, their claims were tolled under American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am
Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the President of the United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:43 am
So, he says that Nixon v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 5:20 am
Nothing in her remarks evidenced any sympathy with shareholders and their substantive rights under state law.The irony in the positions taken by Casey and Atkins is that the access proposal in fact permits private ordering and respects state law. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 6:31 am
Brownstein, Sabastian V. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 8:44 am
Business Roundtable v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For example, in Liu v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 6:30 am
Lamoreaux (Arizona State University), on Thursday, January 10, 2019 Tags: Audits, Disclosure, Engagement, Information environment, Internal control, Investor protection, Market efficiency, Oversight, Reporting regulation, Restatements, Risk oversight, Sarbanes–Oxley Act, SOX, SOX Section 404 Talking Governance with Donna Anderson Posted by Michael Flaherty and Patricia Figueroa, Gladstone Place… [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 6:16 am
Companies Posted by Jennifer V. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:29 am
For example, in SEC v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 2:52 pm
†Under the Supreme Court’s precedent in Edmond v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 8:39 pm
***See also The TSM test after KSR v. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 7:20 am
Such cases include law suits that cross state lines, actions by the Internal Revenue Service, violations of federal compliance regulations (such as HIPAA and Sarbanes-Oxley), immigration cases, and more. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:12 pm
In Stein, the Sixth Circuit stated that IndyMac represented “the more cogent and persuasive rule. [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:17 am
The state’s high court also found it significant that FCPA enforcement actions have increased in the last decade after the DOJ made enforcement a priority in the post-Enron and Sarbanes-Oxley era. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Similarly, the OECD Member-States eventually ratifying an Anti-Bribery Convention in 1997, requiring them to adopt legislation similar to that found in the 1977 U.S. [read post]