Search for: "OXLEY v. STATE"
Results 561 - 580
of 653
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Similarly, the OECD Member-States eventually ratifying an Anti-Bribery Convention in 1997, requiring them to adopt legislation similar to that found in the 1977 U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
– unusually entertaining cases before the CAFC: Cornish v Doll (Patently-O) The Independent Inventor’s Handbook (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) CAFC en banc: Methods do not have exportable components and therefore method claims cannot be infringed under… [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 3:42 am
(Free Enterprise Fund and Beckstead & Watts v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 2:06 am
9th Circuit Allows SOX Whistleblower Claim to Go Forward A Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower suit brought by two former in-house attorneys may proceed, ruled a unanimous 9th Circuit panel (Van Asdale v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 8:34 pm
Co. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 8:00 am
As many commentators have noted (with different views of its import), federal laws and regulations and especially the Sarbanes Oxley Act (along with changes they inspired in stock exchanges’ regulations), taken cumulatively, are impinging on territory once safeguarded to corporate internal affairs and hence state corporate law. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 9:55 am
From an extended examination of Chadwick LJ’s judgment in Oxley v Hiscock [2004] EWCA Civ 546, which expressly raises ‘fairness’ on the basis of relevant conduct as the criterea by which share of interest should be assessed, in the absence of express agreement, and Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, which appears to limit ‘fairness’ and expressly concerned shares in a property in joint names, where Oxley v… [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:04 pm
FEC and Austin v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
In Green v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:00 am
The case is Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:10 am
The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to rule on the constitutionality of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act passed in 2002 to create a new government agency to regulate firms that audit the books of publicly traded companies. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:07 am
United States (07-9086) and Megginson v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 3:36 am
The Supreme Court granted cert. today in a case, Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 4:00 am
All rights reserved.In Tice v Bristol-Myers Squibb, No. 07-3977, the U.S. [read post]
10 May 2009, 5:53 pm
v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, the principal laws that protect investors and preserve business integrity are (i) the Securities Act of 1933, (ii) the Securities Act of 1934, (iii) the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, (iv) the Investment Company Act of 1940, (v) the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and (vi) the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 1:43 pm
— State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:53 am
(Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
For more information about the firm's Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Practice, click here. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 11:56 am
Free Enterprise Fund and Beckstead & Watts LLP v. [read post]
