Search for: "Oliver v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2010, 5:25 am
Oliver v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:27 am
Oliver, No. 08-15738 In an action by a Michigan winery claiming that certain provisions of Arizona's statutory scheme regulating the direct shipment of wine from wineries — whether located in-state or out-of-state — to Arizona consumers violated the dormant Commerce Clause, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where Arizona's statutory exceptions to its three-tier distribution system, which treated similarly situated in-state and… [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 9:59 pm
If so, you may recall an article covering AT&T v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:24 am
A couple of other cases likewise have been reversed by the Court of Appeals lately, and the employers have asked the state Supreme Court to review.In addition to the Guzman case, the commission has been reversed on the same grounds in Oliver v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Negligence in complying with the Open Meetings Law may not be sufficient to vacated decisions made at a meeting subject to its provisionsCutler v Town of Mamakating, 2016 NY Slip Op 01543, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Town of Mamakatingabolished its position of Parks Maintenance Supervisor.The then incumbent of the position, Oliver Cutler, challenged the Town’s action. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 12:20 pm
The rules have made it possible for the Eastern District of Texas, for example, to become so popular (for an entertaining 11 minutes, see John Oliver's Last Week Tonight on Patents). [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 3:34 pm
To further raise the bar, in Oliver v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 8:01 am
Forsythe, Abuse of Discretion: The Inside Story of Roe v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:05 am
Ctr. at Orange, 116 N.J. 7, 15 (1989) (citing 2 State of New Jersey Constitutional Convention of 1947, Committee on the Judiciary Report § 11(J) at 1187 (1947)); accord Oliver v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 6:12 pm
Ed. 2d 562 (1974).In re Oliver, 68 S. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 4:44 pm
State law required Paul V. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 4:44 pm
State law required Paul V. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
The Court granted certiorari in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:28 am
The first article in the issue is titled “Plessy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:28 am
The first article in the issue is titled “Plessy v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:05 pm
Breza, 308 F.3d 430,] at 433 (quoting Oliver v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:50 am
”); Oliver v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 9:54 am
And in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:48 am
(For the US view on forced sterilizations, and Oliver Wendell Holmes majority opinion that "three generations of imbeciles are enough" , check out Buck v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:30 am
The case is State v. [read post]
