Search for: "P. v. Case" Results 561 - 580 of 25,677
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2024, 5:55 am by Victor Kattan
The Significance of the Apartheid Claim The arguments advanced in the proceedings before the ICJ that Israel has imposed an apartheid regime on Palestinians could in due course be even more consequential than the case South Africa brought against Israel under the 1948 Genocide Convention – even though advisory opinions are not formally binding on the U.N. organ (in this case the U.N. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:51 am by Jocelyn Bosse
” The stool had been the subject of a registered design, but the case concerned whether the work of applied art met the originality requirement and had been infringed under copyright law.Marcel Pemsel evaluated the recent CJEU judgment in The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann GbR (Case C-382/21 P), which held that the Paris Convention does not allow cross-IP priority claims in general. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:09 am by Dylan Gibbs
Campbell did expect privacy in the text messages, but the police were allowed to act quickly to keep dangerous drugs off the street — they didn’t need a warrant because of exigent circumstances.R. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
By Atreya Mathur ​​In a world where creativity knows no bounds and the lines between art, inspiration and infringement blur, one art collective stands at the forefront of pushing these boundaries. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Shea Denning
It turned to other cases addressing the subject of alternate jurors for guidance, referencing its holding in State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 1:19 pm by Dylan Gibbs
Cases of interest, like the doctor disciplined for his masking viewsA father’s fight against medical assistance in dyingMeat rules on both sides of the borderCRIMINAL LAWCommon sense prevails at the SCCR. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  As Hasen recounts (p. 23), the Supreme Court shamefully refused to intervene in Alabama’s blatantly racist denial of voting rights in Giles v. [read post]