Search for: "P. v. Germany"
Results 561 - 580
of 584
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2008, 1:38 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty) Ltd:… [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 1:08 pm
The Court of Justice handed down a judgment in Case C-267/06 Tadao Maruko v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 2:29 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 6:26 pm
It may have amused certain of his cronies to see good ol' boy Ezra Levant ambush, bully and harangue the very unfortunate woman assigned by the Alberta Human Rights and Citizenship Commission to investigate the complaints advanced against him. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 3:47 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 2:36 pm
In Case T-374/04 Germany v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 9:51 am
Beteiligungs KG v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 6:53 am
I. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
P. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 5:01 am
Germany Shala & Another v. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 4:03 pm
There was a criminal action in Germany under Germany's antiterrorism law - the guys ultimately apologized. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:51 pm
Of particular interest here is that part of the opinion and order (with thanks to Adam Savett of Securities Litigation Watch), in which the Court, after presuming and rebutting ABP being the most adequate plaintiff, presumes Union to be the most adequate (from p.13). [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 5:54 pm
’ (p.50 (54 of 142)) In an open letter, Max W. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 8:20 am
A "quick and dirty" translation of the reasoning of the Advocate General in the LIMONCHELO dispute, Case C- 344/05 P OHIM v Shaker (see earlier post by the IPKat here), comes from Stéphane Ambrosini (Tomkins & Co, Dublin): "24. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 6:39 am
Spitz, paragraph 22; and Case C‑308/04 P SGL Carbon v Commission, paragraph 15). [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 1:31 am
A response to Merges, By Hal Wegner Professor Robert P. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 1:31 pm
Partan, International Law Processes Michael P. [read post]
