Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 561 - 580
of 4,548
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Tompkins v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 3:19 pm
” Strawbridge says that this was precisely what happened in Kilbourn v. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 8:50 am
[The Sosa v. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 4:23 pm
Why precisely not? [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
Moreover, because some of the Foreign Affairs Manual provisions largely parroted the applicable statutory standards, Exemption 7(E) could not justify redacting those portions of the Manual. [read post]
12 Sep 2006, 4:58 pm
Ferring v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 1:06 pm
R. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
In Moran v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 10:30 pm
Furthermore, as the Supreme Court said about the death penalty in Furman v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
There is no other precisely defined judicial review standard and judges recurrently decide some matters de novo although an agency has presented a reasonable construction of the statute. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 6:12 am
(Korea IP Law Blog) US: Senate Agriculture/FDA Appropriations Bill amendment seeks to streamline development and regulation of products for rare and neglected diseases (FDA Law Blog) US: Professor Grabowski’s economic analysis of data exclusivity for follow-on biologic drugs (Patent Docs) US: Follow-on biologics news briefs: President Obama wants to speed up introduction of generic drugs; biosimilars pose ‘limited threat’; Amgen CEO says… [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:51 am
In the next stage of its continuing quest to reexamine every significant aspect of the Federal Circuit’s doctrinal framework for patents, the Court in Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:03 am
Quill Corporation v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 12:59 pm
Outside of certain categories of speech, such as sexually themed speech, speech that could be school sponsored, or speech that arguably promotes drug use, the prevailing test courts use was set forth in Tinker, which requires “substantial disruption” from speech before it can be used a basis for discipline. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:45 pm
Relying heavily on Skilling v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 11:58 am
Unlike County of Inyo v. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 10:13 am
Katz v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 6:14 am
Div. of Labor Standards Enforcement v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:14 pm
Razak et al. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 12:26 pm
So what makes us think he actually pay the installments on the settlement? [read post]
