Search for: "Pacer System"
Results 561 - 580
of 917
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2011, 9:33 am
The Committee is aware of cases where the Court has previously ruled by summary order on the precise contention being made in a pending case, on indistinguishable facts, and of other cases where a summary order may be the only authority on point.Of particular note in Hollander is that a copyright owner's market for a work would not be destroyed by publication of the work on the court's PACER system because retrieving it from PACER is cumbersome.Finally, the… [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
We must remember that extremely limited judicial review of awards is one of the reasons for having the international arbitration system in the first place. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
First of all, a lot more stuff slips under the radar screen in state court, especially on the trial court level (where very little ends up reported), than in federal courts, where Westlaw and Lexis get a much greater percentage of the total results using PACER (a nationwide electronic docketing system).With state courts, we’re much more dependent upon what our readers send us. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:48 pm
EXPANDED PACER FEE WAIVER In March 2010, the Judicial Conference of the United States approved reducing the costs for many users of the PACER system. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 8:14 am
As Ball's lawyer wrote in a sentencing memo (available on PACER): [More...] [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:14 am
Merpel wants to know why, when almost every day there seems to be a new research project on the cost of patents or their impact on the economy, no-one seems yet to be commissioning or carrying out any research into the impact and effect of these parasites on the IP system. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:17 am
It’s the kind of motion we’d normally be inclined to scroll right over on PACER: a procedural motion that really has no bearing on the outcome of a case. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:01 am
In the meantime, the case was publicly posted to PACER, the court’s docket system. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 5:52 am
Instead of the conventional method of relying on courts’ holdings categorized in treatises or “tagged” via West Key Numbers, lawyers might analyze facts in extensive databases of cases or court records available through PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) to predict case results. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 7:45 am
The systems will be operational at the opening of business on Monday, February 14, 2011. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:59 am
Federal Courts’ system for electronic access called PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records). [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 6:46 pm
Filed under: Applications, Others' scholarly or sophisticated blogposts, Policy debates, Policy Materials, Technology developments, Technology tools Tagged: Aaron Swartz, Carl Malamud, Center for Information Technology Policy, CITP, Court docket systems, Court documents, Court information systems, Crowdsourcing and legal information systems, Ed Felten, Free access to law, Harlan Yu, Judicial information systems, Law.gov, Open government data, PACER,… [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:27 am
Courts reported that the PACER system was being inundated with requests. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:27 am
From the PACER report, it appears that the defendants haven't contested the publishers' claims. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 3:20 pm
The Government does a valiant job of arguing for a higher guideline range in a pleading entitled "Objections to Presentence Report" (available on PACER.). [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:30 am
My dream app would be able to sort through information from all of my data sources -- my document management system, my e-mail, the documents on my work and home computers, court dockets for my cases, such as the PACER system for federal courts, my notes, et cetera -- and allow me to find information from any of those sources with the speed of a Google search.BONUS QUESTION: What do you think is the best depiction in popular culture of legal technology? [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 11:20 am
A quick check of PACER, however, shows that the sentencing memorandum and an earlier response to the Presentence Investigation Report were filed by the defense in the open—that is, not under seal. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 6:40 am
The fraud allegations involving Briskman seem pretty thin to me, and it doesn't seem like there's any greater issue pertaining to systemic misconduct in the Asset Forfeiture Program. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 3:27 pm
It's a blatant systemic problem. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 4:32 am
I am not going to get back into the dispute over the PACER system and charges for its access; but, check out CourtPort the next time you have to do a public records search. [read post]
