Search for: "Paris v. United States" Results 561 - 580 of 791
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2012, 12:12 pm by Veronika Gaertner
Boris Kasolowsky/Magdalene Steup: “Dallah v Pakistan – Umfang und Grenzen der Kompetenz-Kompetenz von Schiedsgerichten” – the English abstract reads as follows: The UK Supreme Court and the Paris Cour d’appel have recently confirmed, in connection with the ICC arbitration involving Dallah and Pakistan, that the national state courts are not bound by any determinations made by an arbitration tribunal with regard to the existence of a valid… [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:48 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
The seat of arbitration was Paris but the hearings were held for convenience in London. 27.05.2002: The award was passed in May 2002. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Iraq might then be surprised—even unfairly surprised—to be haled into court in the United States on a judgment against the Ministry under French law. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 10:04 am by rlargent@cdflaborlaw.com
Van Parys On January 11, 2012 the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Hosanna-Tabor v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:05 pm by Bradley Joondeph
” The approach of the United States, arguing as amicus curiae, was a shade different. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:07 am by Victoria VanBuren
GUEST-POST PART I | States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration: AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:36 pm
 After Mr Justice Vos gave judgment in United Air Lines Inc v United Airways Limited and United Airways Bangladesh Limited (unreported, but noted here by the IPKat), the good judge refused permission to appeal on the basis that this was about the most irresistible application for summary judgment for trade mark infringement and passing off as you could hope to find, even taking into account the defendants' submissions in their skeleton… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:30 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The case was decided by the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Paris Division, in 1997. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:08 pm by justinsilverman
For those in the United States, this watchdog role is protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 9:54 am
The attacks of September 11, 2001, had just occurred, and so often the talk turned to the United States' responses to those attacks.A few years later, I returned to Paris to speak about U.S. detention policy as part of a joint lecture, with Cassese, entitled Crime contre l’humanité, génocide et torture. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 10:21 am by Steve McConnell
The Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act does not apply to "actions or transactions specifically authorized by laws administered by any regulatory body or officer acting under statutory authority of this State or the United States. [read post]