Search for: "Parker v. Parker"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2012, 11:18 am
The style of the case is William Norris v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:04 am
The Waco case is Texas Association of School Boards, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 2:17 am
The qualification is that “the Lanham Act’s tolerance for similarity between competing marks varies inversely with the fame of the prior mark,” Kenneth Parker Toys Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 7:14 am
The issue for the Court of Appeals (Winter, Parker and Hall) is what to do about this violation. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:30 am
The qualification is that “the Lanham Act’s tolerance for similarity between competing marks varies inversely with the fame of the prior mark,” Kenneth Parker Toys Inc .v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 3:42 am
The first is Parker Drilling Management Services. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:33 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2025, 1:56 pm
Per the Second Circuit’s ruling today in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
In CHARLES KRIK v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 10:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 10:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:09 pm
Rick Rojas of The New York Times has an article headlined “The Alabama Chief Justice Who Invoked God in Deciding the Embryo Case; Chief Justice Tom Parker has long been revered by conservative groups as an architect for the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:02 am
The defendant in US v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 3:07 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:54 am
Patent Owner contends that, unlike the claims in [Parker v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:30 pm
David Kopel replies to criticism of the treatment of English legal history and the right to carry arms in an amicus brief in Wrenn v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:15 pm
In the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm
On the other hand, it is often treated, most notably under the Supreme Court’s now pivotal decision in Penn Central Transportation Co v. [read post]
