Search for: "People v Case"
Results 561 - 580
of 57,561
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 9:15 am
This case is Sheward squared: a single judge has effectively told every other judge in the State that he or she cannot follow the will of the People as expressed through a legislative supermajority. [read post]
History Shows the Supreme Court Knows How to Move Quickly, as it Should With the Trump Immunity Case
22 Apr 2024, 5:50 am
(The Supreme Court has another case pending this term, Fischer v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
—, 144 S.Ct. 756 (March 15, 2024), considered with a companion case O’Connor-Radcliffe v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:59 am
That argument held sway in a separate case Martin v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:30 am
I have raised these very views in class every time I teach the marriage equality cases. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:36 pm
JL v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm
Indeed, Jack Smith can be sued in torts for unconstitutionally depriving people of liberty and property. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 8:18 am
Italian Sons & Daughters of America v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 3:57 am
In Meinecke v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 4:51 pm
The Inter-American Court of Human RightsIndigenous People Maya Kaqchikel from Sumpango v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 1:32 pm
Defences How to Beat a Procuring Identity Documents Charge Every case is different. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:19 pm
Sadly, since 2022’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:05 pm
Bembury v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:35 am
Defences The defences available to a lottery offence charge are entirely dependent on the facts of your case. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:00 am
In 1962, in Robinson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 10:48 am
Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
The defendants in these cases argue that when the Supreme Court held a few years ago in Ramos v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 6:41 am
This reinstated her case. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
From yesterday's decision in Meinecke v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 1:00 am
The case, Whittington v. [read post]