Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,807
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
The leading authority for many years has been Hunt v- Severs (1994). [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
House of Lords rejects changes to Religious Education On 12 July, during the Report Stage of the Schools Bill, the House of Lords rejected an amendment that would have insisted that Religion and Worldviews be taught in academies without a religious character in England. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
This could result in no postponement of limitation periods for people involved in motor vehicle accidents in which vehiclar damage occurs. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:05 am
In Matter of W.K. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:43 am
Thus in Pham v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:09 am
Quite how all these people will proceed without Legal Help I don't know. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 11:56 pm
Some people get really excited about contentious IP work but find transactional issues quite dull. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 1:45 am
It was agreed that the correct test for dishonesty was the "combined" test of Lord Hutton in Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley [2002] 2 AC 164 being that: "before there can be a finding of dishonesty it must be established that the defendant's conduct was dishonest by the ordinary standards of reasonable and honest people and that he himself realised by those standards his conduct was dishonest. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:17 am
I have fond memories of Dorset Yacht Co Ltd v Home Office [1970] AC 1004 from my days as a law student. [read post]
21 May 2009, 12:00 am
There is no evidence as to why people took licences. [read post]
22 May 2017, 10:01 pm
The new space will allow each side to have 16 attorneys in the court room at a time, and it can accommodate a total of 132 people. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
Bank Mellat v HM Treasury [2011] EWCA Civ 1: read judgment. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm
In Sheldrake v Director of Public Prosecutions [2005] 1 AC 264 Lord Bingham emphasised that in the case of Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act any such interpretation would be beyond such possibility: change the substance of (the) provision completely, or would remove its pith and substance. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:51 am
See McCormick v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 2:15 pm
The House of Lords in O’Rourke v Camden LBC (1998) AC 188, and the court of appeal in X v Hounslow found no duty of care in Part VII and Part VI Housing Act 1996 obligations, or their previous equivalents. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm
Previous Conditions Lady Justice Smith and Lord Justice Mummery both considered whether the conditions in which the person concerned had lived previously were relevant. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
United States: In People v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:49 am
In October 2011 the Supreme Court delivered its long-awaited ruling in Axa General Insurance v Lord Advocate [2011] UKSC 46. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:22 am
The Court agreed that the Secretary of State, in assessing the impact of the scheme on people within the lower socio-economic groups in a generalised way, had not sufficiently focused on the details of his equality duties. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 3:07 am
Lord Hope and Lady Hale give the judgment of the Court. [read post]
