Search for: "People v Younger" Results 561 - 580 of 1,100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2015, 7:17 am by Joy Waltemath
The trial court’s decision granting summary judgment was reversed in part (Tilley v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Administrator
Germans use äh and ähm; the French use eu, euh, em, eh, and oh, and Spanish-speaking people use eh, em, este, and pues.16 There is even a sign for um in American Sign Language.17 Virtually everyone uses verbal fillers, though the frequency can vary greatly from person to person.18 A study of one language database showed that speakers produced between 1.2 and 88.5 uhs and ums for every thousand words, with a median filler rate of 17.3 per thousand words.19 Other databases show… [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 1:49 pm by Roy Black
The people who need it the most just don’t show up. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 12:53 pm by Jim Gerl
  In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 10:41 am
He also helped people in need, such as by loading grocery bags into cars for people at the store and helping his blind grandfather do laundry. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:44 pm
 (V) Solicitation to commit murder as defined in Section 653f. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 2:54 pm by Jim Gerl
Younger students of both sexes are the most likely to be singled out as victims. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
We might instead prohibit unions of people over a particular age, given that older eggs and older sperms are far more likely to yield genetic anomalies than their younger counterparts. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 6:44 am by Joy Waltemath
The GM said it was “nothing personal,” but they were “just looking for younger people” based on the advice of consultants hired to evaluate the snack bar. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 5:44 am by Giles Peaker
While the statement of reasons in this case gives a clear basis for the decision, there is no address to the Upper Tribunal case of TD v SSWP and London Borough of Richmond-Upon-Thames (HB) 2013 UKUT 642 AAC or the finding on the meaning of ‘occupy’ in the regulations in R (Marchant) v Swale Borough Council HBRB [2000] 1 FLR 246. [read post]