Search for: "People v. Barrett"
Results 561 - 580
of 880
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2021, 1:18 pm
In Garcetti v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
Cited in 'People Are Pissed': Pass/Fail Grading Controversy Roils Law Schools, Law.com (Mar. 25, 2020). [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 12:21 pm
In cases like Pickering v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:50 pm
Justice Barrett is new, but Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh have been serving on the SCOTUS for some time already and they're going to look at the issue, not the party. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 7:21 am
In Collins v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
Philipp, which also involves the confiscation of Jewish people’s property during the Holocaust, concerns the scope of 28 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
Additionally, in Phillip v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:18 am
The Supreme Court heard argument on Monday by telephone in Pham v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
They also cite Sosa v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:57 am
Under current Supreme Court doctrine, Brandenburg v. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 5:24 am
JULY saw a huge Twitter hack of many prominent people. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm
If enforced, the rule might have removed nearly 700,000 people from the program. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 7:13 am
§ 230(c)(1); Barrett v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 12:16 pm
In Valentine v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 1:00 pm
Los Angeles v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
The result was a hodgepodge of conflicting opinions and at least four main treatments described by then-Judge Barrett in Gadelhak v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:26 am
By the time Indiana appealed its loss at the Seventh Circuit, SCOTUS would include Justice Amy Coney Barrett, and many court-watchers wondered whether the change to the bench would result in the Court’s eroding its landmark decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:35 pm
And, Justice Barrett did not signal her recusal. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:59 am
Bell v. [read post]
