Search for: "People v. Bias"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2011, 1:57 pm
(See New York Times v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:20 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil Practice Bias, Harassment Litigant Loses Bid To Retain Pro Bono Counsel Hennghan v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
In Flowers v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 10:01 am
I.V. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 2:12 pm
Not surprisingly, Judge Haden knows a wide variety of people at Luce Forward, who's suing the defendants for unpaid legal fees. [read post]
13 May 2010, 6:15 am
Armendariz. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Donald Trump’s calls for the judge presiding over the federal fraud lawsuit against Trump University, Gonzalo Curiel, to remove himself from the case because of ethnicity-inspired bias against Mr. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 4:42 pm
Here is the abstract:In recent years, anti-discrimination theory and doctrine have rested heavily on the anti-caste principle first enunciated in Strauder v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 12:14 am
SUFFOLK COUNTYCriminal PracticeLaw of Depraved Indifference Murder Not to Be Applied Retroactively; Defendant Denied Vacatur People v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 7:13 am
The case is Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 11:11 am
Cariou v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
The petitioners’ brief in DeBoer v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 8:00 am
Supreme Court issued a powerful decision in Flowers v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:58 am
This judgment is within the scope of reasoning in Louis Vuitton v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:01 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 2:23 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 6:45 am
(See Saulic v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:02 am
” Political bias: rules v. enforcement. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
INA § 212(a)(6)(A)(i) states that “An alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled . . . is inadmissible”, and the BIA held in Matter of V-X-, 26 I&N Dec. 147 (BIA 2013) , that a grant of asylum is not an “admission” for these purposes, leaving asylees subject to the grounds of inadmissibility (although with the proviso that they cannot be removed unless their asylum status is terminated). [read post]
