Search for: "People v. Billings"
Results 561 - 580
of 9,467
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
In short, they suggest that sometimes a “perfectly legal” ruse is not being invoked to evade the intent of a law—which is what, for example, people mean when they say that certain abusive tax shelters might be wrong but are technically within the meaning of a poorly written provision. [read post]
13 May 2023, 10:46 am
” In re Marriage of Velasquez, 692 NE 2d 841 – Ill: Appellate Court, 3rd Dist. 1998 Rights that exist independently between a husband and wife are the same that would exist between any two people: the right to contract with each other, the right not to be harmed by the other, etc. [read post]
12 May 2023, 1:23 pm
People v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 10:59 am
Most recently in Brown v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 8:24 am
" A former governor here became a US senator who was a leader of the "massive resistance" movement against Brown v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:55 am
Fraser v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 5:05 pm
The case, Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 5:00 am
By Yvonne Lindgren In Dobbs v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am
”[5] HISTORICAL BACKGROUND An estimated 600,000 artworks were looted from Jewish people during the Nazi era.[6] The New York law defines the Nazi era as between 1933 and 1945, covering coercively exchanged property from the start of Hitler’s rise to power to the end of World War II. [read post]
10 May 2023, 7:48 pm
" Fifth, in Caetano v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 1:55 pm
Lost in translation: Absence of domestic implementation of international norms for the Indigenous Peoples of the United States. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
People with access to high-quality information will get ahead. [read post]
9 May 2023, 7:33 am
–Kuklinski v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:30 pm
He reports with apparent gratification that “all across the country, people began expressly working on building incentives into legal rules” (OI, v.1, 332). [read post]
8 May 2023, 5:00 am
In one recent federal district court opinion, Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am
China The Fei Chang Dao blog has published an article setting out examples of the People’s Republic of China government’s regulation of online public sentiment. [read post]
7 May 2023, 7:42 am
Urquhart in the 2000s and California Assemblymember Buffy Wicks today) can single-handedly push through a string of punitive and poorly theorized bills targeting specific Internet companies. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:49 pm
” There seems to be only one relevant precedent: Televest v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 8:47 am
In JB v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:31 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
