Search for: "People v. Carter" Results 561 - 580 of 735
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2011, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Lucy Middleton is a solicitor at Carter-Ruck specialisting in defamation, privacy and confidence [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:44 am by Brian Shiffrin
In People v Stith (69 NY2d 313 [1987]) the Court of Appeals held that the People must timely object to a defendant's failure to prove standing in order to preserve that issue for appellate review. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Poor Gary Flitcroft was something of a standard bearer when he sought his injunction in A v B almost a decade ago. [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:14 pm by Christa Culver
 Typically, when people think of defamation, they think of the New York Times v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:52 am
Apple v Samsung v Apple v Samsung v Apple....Last year the AmeriKat was constantly up-to-date reporting on the latest of the patent mobile phone wars. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
Aren’t there a bunch of plaintiffs out there suing Eli Lilly because its anti-schizophrenia drug, Zyprexa supposedly causes diabetes – at least in obese people who would probably contract the disease anyway? [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
Over the last few months, we here at Abnormal Use have corresponded regularly with our friends at the Drug and Device Law blog, most notably Steve McConnell and Jim Beck, about both the law and popular culture. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
It is closer to the language of search warrants which were held to authorize an off-premises search of named persons in People v Carter, People v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:58 am by INFORRM
  As to the likely impact of the case, solicitor Nigel Tait of Carter-Ruck told the Press Association that “There is no doubt that the decision in MGN v UK heralds the end of the 100 per cent success fee in publication cases in the near future. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 10:41 am
People who trade off of Michael's personality, copyrights and trademarks should not be allowed to exploit the legacy of one of the world's most recognized talents for their own benefit. [read post]