Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 561 - 580
of 52,265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2013, 12:42 pm
It may well be -- as the Court of Appeal holds -- that a criminal court doesn't have the statutory power to enter a restraining order in an extortion case, unlike some other criminal cases (e.g., stalking, domestic violence, etc.).However, if that's indeed the case, the law should be changed.Defendant tries to extort a job from someone by threatening him. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 6:36 am
Such was the case in Moncrieffe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2006, 5:22 pm
That's good enough for a stop.A tough case. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:38 am
This comports with the recent Illinois Supreme Court case, People v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:44 am
Everything's affirmed.But nonetheless and unusual case. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 2:38 pm
See what you think about this one.The backpack in the car almost certainly belonged to one of the three people in the vehicle. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:55 am
They definitely adopt different perspectives on the exact same case, which is always interesting. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 11:40 am
Case Citation: Doe I v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 11:51 am
It's a case where you can understand the verdict. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 9:35 am
Cases that so hold are legion.But apparently not in DUI cases. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 9:17 am
The ruling in the case of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 9:53 pm
With that said, his post speculating on how the brand new SCOTUS case Arizona v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
Virtually identical to the two cases here is the high court's unanimous decision in Knowles v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 11:10 am
Three North Carolina cases on custody during traffic stops that you may want to read are State v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 11:10 am
Three North Carolina cases on custody during traffic stops that you may want to read are State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 8:25 am
In Duhon v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 9:07 am
The case of State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 10:47 am
In Arista v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:04 pm
The majority rebuts every facet of the argument, emphasizing–as it obvious to everyone but Section 230-haters–that deciding what to publish is an editorial function, whether it’s done by people or machines. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:55 am
In 2005, Succar v. [read post]
