Search for: "People v. Cohen"
Results 561 - 580
of 823
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
The Guardian has a similar piece focusing on issues surrounding DNA testing as has the Thomson Reuters Foundation which has noted the increasing trend of people using DNA test kits. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
This role was exposed in last week’s judgment in R v Norman ([2016] EWCA Crim 1564) which was discussed on the Panopticon blog Roy Greenslade in the Guardian said that the “wrong people were prosecuted over journalists’ payments to police,” and that the police should have been investigating Rupert Murdoch’s publishing business instead of France. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 2:12 pm
Co., 151 F. 376 (9th Cir. 1907), Cohen v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:40 am
Resolved cases include: A woman v The People, Clause 1, 3, 6, 07/06/2012; Mr David Wieberg v The Guardian, Clause 1, 06/06/2012; Mary Reid v Daily Record, Clause 1, 01/06/2012; A woman v Kent & Sussex Courier, Clauses 1, 5, 6 31/05/2012; Adam Wood v Yorkshire Evening Post, Clause 1, 30/05/2012; Ms Belinda Cunnison v Berwickshire News, Clause 1, 30/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Daventry Express, Clause 1, 30/05/2012; Ms Helen… [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
Journalism and the PCC There are no adjudicated PCC rulings to report, but several “resolved” cases including: Miss Catherine Lemon v Western Daily Press (Clause 1, 20/01/2012); A woman v The People (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); A woman v Daily Mail (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Ayr Advertiser (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Dr Esther Hobson v The Star… [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:06 pm
Clear coverage: Transunion v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Rogers v. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 5:01 am
Cal.) in Young v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 3:52 am
See Tenafly Eruv Ass’n v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Because it's almost inevitable - rummage through enough documents and emails of enough people (a quarter million or so will do) and eventually you're very likely to discover somebody saying, or doing, or proposing something dumb. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 5:02 am
If (for instance) we’re talking about Cohen v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 6:40 am
David Cicilline (RI), Shelia Jackson Lee (TX), Steve Cohen (TN) Karen Bass (CA) and Ro Khanna (CA). [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 6:44 am
But you'll rarely find another oral argument as philosophical than the one just completed in Baze v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 6:11 am
The Supreme Court treated the issue less than transparently in Campbell v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 2:08 am
In a letter no doubt inspired by the phraseology of the Court of Justice of the European Union in L'Oréal v Bellure (see post here and earlier posts from the IPKat), the letter from law firm Mishcon de Reya accuses The Icecreamists of "taking unfair advantage of, and riding on the coattails of" Lady Gaga's trade marks in a manner that is "deliberately provocative and, to many people, nausea-inducing". [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 6:48 am
-Victoria Cohen Little Yappers. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 4:38 am
But use of the word “fuck” has already been specifically addressed by the Supreme Court as a means of political expression, as has obscenity, and its use, vulgar thought it may be and unpleasant as it is for the neighborhood, is protected as explained by Justice Harlan in Cohen v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:27 am
Anyone who has taught Constitutional Law — like me or the President of the United States — is familiar with the way Chief Justice John Marshall used it in Cohens v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 10:02 am
As an example of Realist interpretation, consider Justice Cardozo's decision in Steward Machine v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 10:20 am
(That would appear to be Adam Cohen, as measured and thoughtful a person as any I know.) [read post]
