Search for: "People v. Germany" Results 561 - 580 of 1,296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2015, 10:14 am by Quinta Jurecic
Circuit reversed a lower court's judgment this morning in Obama v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:41 pm by Marie Louise
(IPBiz)   US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas jury invalidates one of EFF’s ‘most wanted’ patents: Bright Response LLC v Google, Yahoo! [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
In addition, the hearing will explore the authorities available to the Administration and the international community to protect the people of Hong Kong, Uyghurs, Kazakhs, and others. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:13 am by Inside Privacy
Why is this exercise so difficult when the main objective – better protecting peoples’ data – should be a consensus priority on the EU agenda? [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:34 am by Kelly
The People) Viacom – Viacom, FAPL and Amici File briefs in Viacom v. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 6:37 pm by centerforartlaw
The international scope of Nazi art looting makes the Supreme Court’s decision in Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
The appeal was allowed in Law Society of British Columbia v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
It is report that Germany will use its presidency of the G20 summit this year to call for global tech regulation. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
In addition, the correct application in domestic law of the ECHR decision in Von Hannover v Germany in particular in relation to the extent of privacy protection for outside activities is also yet to be decided. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 7:57 am by Chris Castle
”  In fact, one could easily argue that TikTok itself implements all three of the Three Warfares in the warfighting doctrine of the People’s Liberation Army—and Bytedance v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Proportional division is feasible as shown by Germany and UK. [read post]
16 May 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Levinson and Balkin mention Shelby County v. [read post]