Search for: "People v. Good"
Results 561 - 580
of 22,438
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2009, 10:12 pm
That's the good stuff. [read post]
8 May 2014, 11:32 am
v=w0DCQq56wdY&list=UU9MLYRK1mnikglrDHEvNxSA&feature=player_detailpage [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 6:49 pm
People v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 8:15 pm
Today, I listened again to Elena Kagan’s oral argument in Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:58 am
It is particularly satisfying that the profit margin remains gratifyingly good, due to a combination of keeping our fees reassuringly high and staff salaries sensibly low. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:15 pm
The Court of Appeals reconsidered application of the exclusionary rule in People v. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 12:01 pm
Windham took umbrage, told Morton she was going to move out, and noted that he also fared poorly in comparison to the 'good looking and big' man in the movie.Not to be outdone in the umbrage department, Morton picked up the chair he had been sitting in, and tried to throw it through the window near Windham. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 11:25 am
Talk about a good time! [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 2:29 pm
Mind you, on the academic side, I think there's actually a pretty good argument the other way. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 2:39 pm
Whether the guy's drinking more nowadays; hey, your guess is at good as mine. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 12:49 pm
Still, that's a pretty good piece of change, and certainly much better than you'd typically do at a liquor store or a bank. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 1:50 pm
That may make for a good internet startup in the old days, but I didn't realize that dispensaries were "upside down" in this fashion.Plus I thought it was interesting that the dispensary here apparently sold weed for above market costs, which I had always thought was opposite of how these things generally worked. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 2:26 pm
I'd call it good police work. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:18 pm
You can charge older people more for goods and services than young people because the former have more money than the latter.So holds the Court of Appeal.I'm sure that the fancy-schmancy "luxury health" fitness club in the Bay Area here decided to charge 18 to 29 year-olds a (much) lower monthly fee than its older patrons because they were concerned that single people in their 20s in the Bay Area had much lower disposable income than their regular… [read post]
21 May 2023, 3:39 pm
On May 17, 2020, the California Supreme Court granted review of the First District Court of Appeal’s controversial and much criticized published decision in Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:19 am
People v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 2:52 am
In People v Kloosterman, the Court of Appeals considered whether a man who made fraudulent returns at Home Depot and sold the goods on Craigslist was guilty of conducting a criminal enterprise (racketeering) under a Michigan statute. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:07 am
" The new law reverses a recent California Supreme Court decisions (Van Horn v. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 4:41 pm
Alexander V. [read post]
