Search for: "People v. Gross" Results 561 - 580 of 1,435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2022, 3:42 pm by Stuart Kaplow
§6901, establishes a rebuttable presumption that any goods, wares, articles, and merchandise mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China, where the U.S. government says China is committing genocide against the Uyghur people, or produced by an entity on a list required by clause (i), (ii), (iv) or (v) of section 2(d)(2)(B) are prohibited under section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930… [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:20 am by Steve Hall
” Things will look different come September, Professor Gross said. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
TheCTA exempts twenty-four kinds of entities from its reporting requirements,including banks, insurance companies, and entities with more than twentyemployees, five million dollars in gross revenue, and a physical office in the UnitedStates. [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:59 pm by Kevin
Looks like we have a new record for Largest Known Demand: Anton Purisma v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 6:55 am by Daniel Cappetta
The United States Supreme Court recently reversed a judgment of the Sixth Circuit in Honeycutt v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am by Andy
If nothing else, the Leveson Inquiry has taught us that many journalists operate to different ethical standards, and are not immune from gross hypocrisy. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 12:50 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  This is also the underlying constitutional question in the Supreme Court's Moore v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
Some legal terms used in our Minnesota criminal justice system are difficult for people to understand. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:55 am by Russ Bensing
  There are court decisions, like State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 11:22 am by admin
Prescriptively, we can, and should, hold people to higher standards. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 2:08 pm
Averill and Karasik v People’s Trust Co. cited by respondent’s counsel to substantiate his position that the failure to file the notice is not a fatal defect are misplaced. [read post]