Search for: "People v. Harders"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2020, 9:00 am
Panel 3: CopyrightSarah Polcz, Loyalties v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:59 am
Might be more productive to focus on that.A: I want to fight the harder case. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:57 am
May be harder to do b/c of DRM. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 5:01 am
The argument of counsel in Smith v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 6:08 am
Thanks to the adoption of a disastrous new Copyright Directive, the European Union is about to require its member states to pass laws requiring online service providers to ensure the unavailability of copyright-protected works. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
So fat chance fixing the Constitution, whether by amendment or a convention as spelled out in Article V of the Constitution. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 12:42 pm
” U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 10:00 am
Is the Supreme Court going to overturn Roe v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 6:56 am
(In the two years since Trump v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Ranking Member Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) called the rule “harmful,” saying that it “would take food away from families, prevent children from getting school meals, and make it harder for states to administer food assistance. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
They raise the price, eliminate competition, cut people out, transfer consumer surplus to themselves—but they are also giving something to people who canafford the chair: a chair with more narrative and thus more market value. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:42 am
W/in institutions (schools, guilds, etc.) differences b/t the kinds of people who call themselves engineers and those who call themselves designers—histories, including gendered histories, of this. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am
Given the text of the two laws in question, it is worth asking why people seem so unafraid of vulnerability under them, even in flouting their apparent terms so openly. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 12:09 pm
The very famous case of New York Times v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am
You owe a duty of loyalty to the President that transcends most other duties, save the paramount one owed to the American people themselves. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
This representation reminded me of a similar colloquy from NFIB v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
., United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 1:38 pm
” (SABAM v. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:59 am
I’ve got to get to the legal stuff at some point, or my web optimizer people will disown me as a client because my non-legal ramblings make their job harder. [read post]
