Search for: "People v. Holder"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,857
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2020, 10:41 am
The limited coverage and copious exceptions in the proclamation will limit the number of people harmed and thus limit the pool of possible challengers. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:13 pm
One of the powers the Act gave to the Supreme Court, writs of mandamus, was the subject of the famous Supreme Court case, Marbury v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 3:57 am
People like this should not be lawyers. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Even post-Civil War and post-Brown v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 8:40 pm
As as aside, Mark and I discussed the use of the Necessity defense many moons ago in the context of the Casa Express v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:04 am
Thoms was even a native title holder. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 5:16 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia, NAACP v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 10:32 pm
Last week the Munich I Regional Court's press office confirmed to me that the Nokia v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 1:41 pm
Microsoft intervened and ultimately resolved the issue.Finally, Ericsson v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 10:06 am
Bird’s eye view of the full courtroom during argument in June Medical Services v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:31 am
The blacklisting of RTSA is intended to increase pressure on Nicolás Maduro’s regime and prevent his “repression of the Venezuelan people“. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 3:54 pm
This seems to me a reasonable argument as to whether an injunction should be granted against production, and indeed, under the fourth factor of the eBay v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:53 am
Disclosure: I am arguing counsel in one of the March cases, Google v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
Stern v. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
The ECtHR ruled that the Lithuanian authorities had failed to strike “a fair balance between, on the one hand, the protection of public morals and the rights of religious people, and, on the other [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 5:38 am
In Apps v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 2:02 pm
The public has a strong interest in information about patent ownership—it’s the government that bestows patent holders the right to keep others from using patented inventions and the ability to sue those who do so without permission.To get permission to use an invention, people need to know who owns the patent. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
When the working class threatened the interests of robber barons in late nineteenth century, for example, the illiterate and semiliterate poor were kept from the polls through literacy tests and poll taxes, not unlike the restrictive voter identification laws introduced after the Shelby County v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:03 am
This post unpacks briefings from the defense, the government and Google (through an amicus brief) on the motion to suppress in that case, U.S. v. [read post]
