Search for: "People v. Lanham" Results 561 - 580 of 786
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm by Bexis
  In the absence of proof that real people were exposed to products that were unsafe or ineffective (instead of just improperly promoted), there is simply no injury, and thus no standing, for any sort of claim by a TPP or other beneficiary for purely economic loss. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
See, e.g., Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 2:26 am by SHG
  The case is Binder v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This is bound up with rules v. standards. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Session 3: The Implications of Tam (and Brunetti)What are the implications of the Tam Court’s First Amendment analysis for other subsections of Lanham Act Section 2? [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 7:31 am
Jeremy considers this difficult story in light of the EU TM Directive and US Lanham Act’s provisions dealing with trade marks contrary to public morality. [read post]