Search for: "People v. Merchant"
Results 561 - 577
of 577
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2007, 12:30 pm
In re-reading the DC Circuit's famous recent Second Amendment decision in Parker v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:41 pm
Futures v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 1:04 am
The fax from Hamilton Bank to West Merchant Bank of London discussed the dumping of a Russian loan and the purchase of a junk Hong Kong loan at above-market prices. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
* Pisciotta v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:40 am
Pakhomious Coptic Orthodox Church an application for a real property tax exemption 599
A7936
Jaffee -- Authorizes Congregation Ribnitz, Inc. to retroactively apply for a property tax exemption 598
A7905
Lopez V (MS) -- Relates to the shelter allowance for individuals and families receiving public assistance and residing in city, state, or federal public housing 597
A7892
Brook-Krasny (MS) -- Relates to shareholder votes in mutual… [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:06 am
Foy KINGS COUNTYCriminal PracticeDefendant's Jail Term Does Not Exceed 90 Days; Defendant Not Entitled to Pre-Sentence Report People v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 11:54 am
Futures, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:34 pm
None other than whether a product is "merchantable. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Supreme Court … The People of the State of New York, ex rel, William Kemmler against Charles F. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 10:09 am
In SONY v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:46 am
See Elektra v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
Whereas modern law generally guarantees rights that are standing features in society, the law in antiquity did not affect the everyday relationships of people unless they were harmed in specific ways. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 4:00 pm
Tucker v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 9:48 pm
E.g., Barnes v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 5:25 am
People have an incredible bond with their companion animals and, when disputes arise, many are often surprised to learn that the law affords these creatures and their custodians a limited array of rights and remedies.By way of example, in Appell v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Defendants have included people who have never even used a computer, and many people who although they have used a computer, have never engaged in any peer to peer file sharing.Sometimes the cases are misleadingly referred to as cases against 'downloaders'; in fact the RIAA knows nothing of any downloading when it commences suit, and in many instances no downloading ever took place.It is more accurate to refer to the cases as cases against persons who paid for internet… [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 5:25 am
We believe Judge Graffeo got it right.Have you ever watched how people shop? [read post]
