Search for: "People v. Mines"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,927
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2019, 2:48 pm
Laird and Marbury v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 5:32 am
Standards-washing: the lesson of Bush v Gore But not all interoperability is created equal. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 1:42 pm
Squire v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 12:14 pm
"Stephan Palmer v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:18 pm
A notable example of the latter was her dissent in Schuette v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 8:38 am
Great Minds v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 4:44 am
[v] Hopwood and I disagree about the notion of “general deterrence. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 5:55 am
Woo v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:05 pm
Lincoln spoke of government "of, by, and for the people. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
City of Boca Ratonand Burlington Industries v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 10:15 am
Some FOSTA-related links that have accumulated over the past few months: Lucy Kahn, “Against FOSTA/SESTA: One Canary’s Cry From Inside the Coal Mine“ Now that FOSTA/SESTA has been voted into law, I’ve literally seen my advertising platforms disappear before my eyes. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:32 am
(I got mine at WaPo.)I feel that the emotional high point came when Kamala Harris was yelling at Joe Biden. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Connecticut or Roe v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 7:56 am
” The problem arises when arrest warrants, and subsequently red notices, are issued maliciously and in bad faith to go after people for political reasons. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:27 pm
Few people, particularly on the left, pine for the return of Bowers v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 5:12 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm
Anyway, it’s probably a non-starter of a suggestion, since there are very few if any people in Canada who are sufficiently expert lawyers or economists to fulfill this role and who would not already have too much baggage to carry and still be perceived as credible to all concerned.So, I expect that my fear – shared by others – that this gratuitous statutory references to the “public interest” and a “competitive market” will become an excuse… [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 6:14 am
(Halleck is a former client of mine by the way; we sued the City of Kingston in 2008 over a different free speech violation).The 5-4 majority notes that the First Amendment only regulates governmental behavior. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
The following articles provide several examples and accompanying commentary (articles cited herein without named authors are mine): “Challenging Electronic Systems’ and Devices” Ability to Produce Reliable Evidence” (SSRN, March 25, 2019). [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
In Gamble v. [read post]
