Search for: "People v. Sharpe" Results 561 - 580 of 1,392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 6 July 2012, Sharp J gave the long awaited judgment in El-Naschie v Macmillan, ([2012] EWHC1809 (QB)) heard 11, 14, 16 to 18, 21, 22, 25, 28-30 November, 1 -2 December 2011. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
That is only one of many discoveries his fresh eyes and sharp mind spotted. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:53 pm by Gene Killian
I was recently reading a decision from a federal appeals court in a case called Sterngold Dental, LLC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:53 pm by Gene Killian
I was recently reading a decision from a federal appeals court in a case called Sterngold Dental, LLC v. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
  Hysteria broke out across the Europhobic tabloid press with the judges being dubbed “the enemies of the people”. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Many suspect that insanity and other excuses based on mental or emotional disorders allow bad people to get away with misconduct. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:48 am
Would any academic (who is reasonably sane) want to go into a situation where hatred of a person, as oppose to "sharp disagreement" with their views, is the order of the day? [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 3:49 am by Rachel Mumby (Bristows)
The tendency of English people to be understated in their use of language (other than on Twitter…) is often joked about with continental friends and colleagues. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:04 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Bowker v Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, heard 21 October 2010 (Sharp J). [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm by Giles Peaker
(I should note that there is some sharp criticism of Ms M’s pleaded defence insofar as it addresses the history of interactions with the Council, and the state of Ms M’s mental health. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 8:55 am by Patricia Hughes
Justice Sharpe refers to La Forest J. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
There are three reasons why I think the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC is wrongly decided. [read post]