Search for: "People v. Sole" Results 561 - 580 of 6,125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2022, 3:30 am by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Anon, European Times:  Patriarchate of Constantinople won a case in Strasbourg for church property in Istanbul: on Arnavutkoy Greek Orthodox Taksiarhis Church Foundation v Turkey [2022] ECHR 1001, which we noted here. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Justice John Marshall Harlan II in Poe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 3:46 am by SHG
The Supreme Court ruled in the landmark 1975 case O’Connor v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 2:28 am by Giles Peaker
Abandonment The process of excluding an absent contract-holder is significantly easier whether against a sole or joint contract-holder. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 11:40 am by Tian Lu
Therefore, the Court found no breach of Art. 10.2 of the TML and dismissed the CNIPA’s appeal.Comment:Apart from the two ways-out, this case also shows that an English term having a sole and direct Chinese corresponding translation does not necessarily represent a geographical name. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 12:06 pm by JURIST Staff
” In this regard, it is crucial to examine the judgment rendered in Rojer Mathew v South Indian Bank Ltd. [read post]
However, the Monitoring at Work Guidance makes clear that employers have an obligation to carry out a DPIA before undertaking any processing likely to cause high risk to workers’ and other people’s interests.The draft Monitoring at Work Guidance places greater importance on carrying out a DPIA when conducting monitoring at work. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 9:07 am by Russell Knight
“[W]hen the property at issue is a small business and the parties have shown that they cannot work together, it is better to award the business solely to one party or the other. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 9:33 am by Earl Drott
Certain seemingly innocuous factual scenarios can present challenges in demonstrating fault, though, as shown in Max Nelson and Carolyn Nelson, as Co-Guardians of Matthew Nelson v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:09 am by Jeewon Serrato and Jamie Kim
Moreover, actions for relief pursuant to AB 587 will be prosecuted exclusively in a court of competent jurisdiction by the attorney general, by a city attorney of a city having a population in excess of 750,000, or by a city attorney in a city and county in the name of the people of the state of California upon their own complaint or upon the complaint of a board, officer, person, corporation or association. [read post]