Search for: "People v. Stamps" Results 561 - 580 of 809
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2012, 11:56 am by Erik Lundegaard
And the administrative agency part of it was really important for Legal Services, because most of what poor people get comes through state agencies--whether it's food stamps or health care or welfare payments. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:30 am by Thomas Lee
For instance, the ATS was successfully invoked by a French privateer (an alien plaintiff) in Bolchos v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm by Pace Law School Library
Land seizures in the People’s Republic of China: protecting property while encouraging economic development. 22 Pac. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:18 am by Legal Beagle
The report by Lord Nimmo Smith is here : REPORT ON MAGIC CIRCLE GAY JUSTICE SCANDAL (pdf) In spite of the cover up, which led to lurid headlines yet no prosecutions, the very same Lord Nimmo Smith, who was branded “Nimmo the Dimmo” by the Sun newspaper, & sought psychiatric treatment after his exposure in the media over the Magic Circle events, has been appointed by the Scottish Football Association to investigate the problems at Rangers FC, as reported earlier HEREOne of the figures… [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:38 pm by admin
But consumers still need to beware, because scam artists are constantly coming up with new ways to deceive people online. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:34 pm by admin
But consumers still need to beware, because scam artists are constantly coming up with new ways to deceive people online. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:40 am by David Post
  Don’t take my word for it; people who know a great deal more about [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:36 pm by Dale Carpenter
  Think of the denial of food-stamp assistance specifically to “hippie communes” even though food stamps are not required benefits (Moore v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:37 pm
By Mike Dorf Judge Reinhardt's 2-1 majority opinion in Perry v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:24 am by Lovechilde
  All three of these Reagan justices were in the majority in Bush v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
It states: “Article 7. (1) All powers in the Republic belong to the people, and their exercise on behalf of the people shall be effected only under, and by the authority of, this Constitution(2) This Constitution is, as the solemn expression of the will of the people, the supreme law of the Republic, and if any other law is inconsistent with this Constitution that other law shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be void. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:47 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
I ran into this dilemma the other day when discussing the classic case of Moore v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 10:34 pm by admin
In 1984, the Supreme Court held in Clark v. [read post]