Search for: "People v. Stock"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,710
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
People become wealthy, and wealthy people become wealthier, because increases in their wealth are income—income that heretofore has enjoyed an incredibly generous subsidy from the rest of us, but income all the same.As an aside, I should also point out that the Wyden proposal would not become a “tax on wealth” simply because sometimes people will have to reduce their net worth (possibly by selling some shares of stock) to pay their taxes. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
People become wealthy, and wealthy people become wealthier, because increases in their wealth are income—income that heretofore has enjoyed an incredibly generous subsidy from the rest of us, but income all the same.As an aside, I should also point out that the Wyden proposal would not become a “tax on wealth” simply because sometimes people will have to reduce their net worth (possibly by selling some shares of stock) to pay their taxes. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:56 am
The district court read that agreement to mean that Appellant’s grandmother transferred her ownership of her sixty-seven shares of stock to Appellant’s mother with the agreement that she would distribute the dividends to various people, including the Appellees and that that agreement gave them legally protected interests as third-party beneficiaries in a constructive trust. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 4:47 pm
For example,the judgment in Austero v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 9:10 am
U.S. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:48 pm
Essex Trading Standards v Wallati Singh [2009] EWHC 520 (Admin) is a Divisional Court (England and Wales) decision from 3 March which the IPKat nearly missed completely. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
Today’s second argument is in Ohio v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:12 am
The Scope of Workplace Privacy Rights In Hernandez v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:01 am
Stocks v. bonds. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:06 am
Christopher v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:54 am
§ 704(b), having granted cert in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:13 pm
Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 4:16 am
"We need more people in enforcement and more people at the commission. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 4:38 pm
Case 1 This case came shortly after the High Court judgment of NT1 & NT2 v Google LLC. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
That is, many of the people who are celebrating Quill’s demise are in favor of progressive taxation, which is to say that we believe that higher-income people should pay higher effective tax rates than lower-income people pay. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 6:13 pm
Of course, it just might be that with the banking system and stock market crumbling like the twin towers, people have more important things to worry about and to base their vote on than who gets to get married in which state. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 8:40 am
Bonds and Pendleton v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 6:55 am
When most people buy stock, they buy it with the intention to hold it as an investment which will eventually yield them a high return. [read post]
4 May 2018, 6:55 am
When most people buy stock, they buy it with the intention to hold it as an investment which will eventually yield them a high return. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:24 am
It is well known that divorce proceedings can be amongst the most bitter and hard-fought in all of litigation, and the Hildebrand principle has long been seen as an important weapon in the otherwise poorly stocked armoury of the poorer partner. [read post]
