Search for: "People v. Vest" Results 561 - 580 of 1,345
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2017, 11:00 am by James E. Pfander
Rumsfeld (2004) (allowing detention of a U.S. citizen as an enemy combatant) and in Boumediene v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 11:50 am by Scott R. Anderson, Yishai Schwartz
The United States described the evolution of its position on Jerusalem from this point forward in its 2014 merits brief in the matter of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:09 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Was I still in Canada, or had someone whisked me away to North Korea, where people must say what officials want to hear? [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Tamar Frankel
” (v) “How often is your account rebalanced? [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm by Matthew Kahn
  As President, I must act to protect the security and interests of the United States and its people. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 7:42 am by Joy Waltemath
The state law did not conflict with federal law vesting interrogation authority in a defined group of federal agents because the state law did not require local officers to make immigration inquiries. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”Raven should be considered alongside the 2009 ruling (almost two decades later) in Strauss v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
A principle designed to protect defendants has strangely metastasized, allegedly vesting somehow in ‘the public’ in a way that misunderstands, again, the meaning of the actual doctrine. [read post]