Search for: "People v. Woods" Results 561 - 580 of 1,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2018, 10:11 am by William Ford
Vance Spath placed the United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
” And according to the historian Gordon Wood, “The Supreme Court has never decided a case on the basis of it. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:40 am by INFORRM
Resolved cases include: A woman v The People, Clause 1, 3, 6, 07/06/2012; Mr David Wieberg v The Guardian, Clause 1, 06/06/2012; Mary Reid v Daily Record, Clause 1, 01/06/2012; A woman v Kent & Sussex Courier, Clauses 1, 5, 6 31/05/2012; Adam Wood v Yorkshire Evening Post, Clause 1, 30/05/2012; Ms Belinda Cunnison v Berwickshire News, Clause 1, 30/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Daventry Express, Clause 1, 30/05/2012; Ms… [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:34 am by Brandon Bartels
In addition, he would interview people in line about why they were there and their impressions of the Court and the case to be argued. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 9:33 am
He is a patent attorney advocate and appeared in the Court of Appeal for England and Wales on Wednesday in Lantana Ltd v Registrar of Patents. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 12:51 pm by Harold O'Grady
We are honored to be part of an incredible profession with so many dedicated people willing to help law students, lawyers and legal professionals. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Felix Wu: If some people are confused, then you’re mixing up people who are confused and people who experience what the law calls dilution. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Subscript offers a graphic explainer for Class v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:41 pm by Betsy McKenzie
This is a short editorial on the Supreme Court hearing the gun control case, McDonald v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
He preferred the approach of Richards LJ in R (C) who had also thought Wood was over-rigid and had been overtaken by Strasbourg database cases (such as Marper v UK) in which REP was not used as a litmus. [read post]