Search for: "Perry v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2025, 2:34 pm
’“; and State of Texas v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:37 am
Perry, the challenge to California’s Proposition 8, and United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am
M'Clung v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
In Coleman v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
United States and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
United States and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:01 pm
The certified question issue has now been docketed at the California Supreme Court, under case number S189476, Perry v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 7:45 am
Wade and the 10th of the ruling in Lawrence v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:09 am
Perry, and on March 27 in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 4:05 am
Perry, Obergefell v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
(Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 2:22 pm
In that year, SCOTUS decided Perry v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 2:22 pm
In that year, SCOTUS decided Perry v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 1:15 am
[AppleResponse] The statute states that an adjudged infringer “shall be liable to the owner to the extent of his total profit. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:02 am
In my latest FindLaw column I consider the possibility of backlash against Judge Walker's ruling in Perry v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 5:10 am
Hernandez v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
Perry; Kevin Russell of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C. was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 10:00 am
June 7, 2012: United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:47 am
The following judgments will be handed down by the Supreme Court on Wednesday 25 July 2012: Perry & Ors v SOCA, Perry & Ors (No. 2) v SOCA, T (Children), Hewage v Grampian Health Board, RT (Zimbabwe) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department, KM v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council v Hickin. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:46 am
[This was a particularly sore point in the Katy Perry case [Katposts here and here], where the Court accepted that since the song had 3.88 million views on YouTube across 6 videos, Perry and could have heard the song. [read post]
