Search for: "Powell v. Doe" Results 561 - 580 of 1,040
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
  Second, the federal rules do not (except in rare cases involving threats or humiliation) allow John Doe pleadings. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
ECtHR jurisprudence made clear that the state was not required to tolerate unlawful occupation Hoire v UK, Yordanova v Bulgari [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
ECtHR jurisprudence made clear that the state was not required to tolerate unlawful occupation Hoire v UK, Yordanova v Bulgari [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 10:01 am
This is the situation that occurred in the Second Department's decision in Novelty Crystal Corp. v PSA Institutional Partners, L.P., 2008 NY Slip Op 00242 decided on January 15th. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:07 pm by Sam Eichner
On January 10, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:59 pm by Ilya Somin
” But as Ben Barros has shown, it was actually deliberately inserted in the Midkiff opinion (O’Connor refused to take it out even after Justice Lewis Powell warned her that it would license virtually unconstrained takings).That said, Stevens is wrong to suggest that the Court’s only options were either to overrule Midkiff and Berman v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
”  Never, but apparently, not for long.On June 20 of last year, in Gundy v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 2:29 pm by Giles Peaker
But complications and distinctions apart, it is now clear that the rule in Monk stands and does so without challenge. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:08 am by Jeff Gittins
 BILLS THAT PASSED House Bill 25: Application RevisionsRepresentative V. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:03 am by Andrew Grossman and Ilya Shapiro
Abigail Fisher, after all, doesn’t ask the Court to overturn its endorsement, in Grutter v. [read post]