Search for: "Power v. Holder"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,827
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:54 pm
What does the Maryland decision mean for DACA holders? [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 8:41 am
Illinois divorce and family courts have a lot of power…in Illinois. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:57 pm
China has given itself broad power to initiate and control the prosecutions of the people of Hong Kong through the new Office for Safeguarding National Security. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:45 am
Trump v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:39 am
Earlier this month in McGucken v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:06 pm
[emphasis added] In enacting the Act, Parliament intended to combat genetic discrimination by filling the gap in existing laws, which would place it in Parliament’s s. 91(27) power over criminal law, rather than the provincial legislatures’ s. 92(13) power over property and civil rights. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:18 pm
Holder. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
District court: Dismissed. Eighth Circuit: Dismissal may have been correct under our old precedent, but the Supreme Court's recent decision in Bostock v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 8:00 am
In Allegheny Defense Project v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 2:16 am
In 2014, the Supreme Court of China ('the SPC') heard a copyright case: Huagai Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:13 pm
AustraliaX v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:01 pm
Holder and Abbott v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:00 am
A type of ‘top-down’ approach was relied on in the 2013 US case In re Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC and the 2014 Japanese case Samsung v Apple Japan (Apple Japan Godo Kaisha v Samsung Electronics Co). [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 11:51 am
See Holder v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 7:44 am
BitPay CEO Stephen Pair told Cointelegraph that the BitPay Card is specifically targeted at crypto holders, serving as a tool to provide a convenient way to access spending power:.. . . [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
" Holder v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:17 am
While they aren’t as powerful and expansive as the rights provided to holders of federally registered trademarks under the Lanham Act, state registration and trademark laws provide the trademark user with reasonably adequate protections. [read post]
