Search for: "Prior v. Department of Revenue"
Results 561 - 580
of 843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2013, 11:23 pm
’” Mangling a quote from a prior decision upholding Section 5, South Carolina v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
(See prior posting.) [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
As executor of Spyer’s estate, Windsor paid more than $350,000 in federal estate taxes to the Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 12:01 pm
By Dennis Crouch Gunn v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 3:54 pm
Rather, the probation department drafts an advisory sentencing report recommending a [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:50 am
In its January 10, 2013 order, New York’s Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed the two orders. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:50 am
In its January 10, 2013 order, New York’s Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed the two orders. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Department of Treasury published final regulations (“Regulations”) implementing these new rules on December 6, 2012. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
Noah Kravitz), LinkedIn (Eagle v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
Noah Kravitz), LinkedIn (Eagle v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 8:03 am
Their monthly support check from the church was deposited in a joint checking account at the Mountain West Bank in Kalispell, Montana, and both Sieler and Rodriguez paid taxes to the IRS and the Montana Department of Revenue. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am
Commissioner, 12-43, had been rescheduled from the October 3 Conference to be considered with the SG’s petition in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 2:52 pm
Upon a second or subsequent conviction for a violation of subsection (1) or (2) of this section within three years of the date of a prior conviction, a secondhand dealer commits a class 5 felony. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 2:52 pm
Upon a second or subsequent conviction for a violation of subsection (1) or (2) of this section within three years of the date of a prior conviction, a secondhand dealer commits a class 5 felony. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:17 am
Earlier this month, a federal judge ruled that when a company took over a departing employee’s LinkedIn account, the company did not violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act in the case of Eagle v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:17 am
Earlier this month, a federal judge ruled that when a company took over a departing employee’s LinkedIn account, the company did not violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act in the case of Eagle v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:55 am
See Aristocrat Technologies v DAP Services (Kempsey) [2007] FCAFC 40 at [48]-[54] and Facton Ltd v Rifai [2012] FCAFC9 at [40]–42] and [48]. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:27 am
In an interesting opinion that includes among other things a noteworthy discussion of issues arising under the Morrison v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:52 am
Therefore, it is common that related parties make gifts to their “flesh and blood” rather than have this money go to the Georgia Department of Revenue or the United States Treasury (the IRS). [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:52 am
Therefore, it is common that related parties make gifts to their “flesh and blood” rather than have this money go to the Georgia Department of Revenue or the United States Treasury (the IRS). [read post]
