Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice" Results 561 - 580 of 1,813
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2014, 8:32 am by Jamie Maclaren
In the recent SCC decision in Canada v Bedford, Chief Justice McLachlin outlined two basic conditions that each permit a lower court to depart from precedent set by a higher court: (1) a new legal issue is raised by the parties or by significant developments in the law; and (2) new circumstances or evidence fundamentally shift the parameters of the debate. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm by Matthew Chagares
The court relied on Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:22 am by David Doniger
  As Chief Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes elegantly said in the 1907 a case called Georgia v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 12:12 pm by Nabiha Syed
Lyle Denniston of this blog reports on the Montana Supreme Court’s decision to ban independent corporate spending on state elections, a decision seemingly in conflict with the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm by Jasmine Harris
Agencies such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Department of Justice, and the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights play an important role in identifying and correcting civil rights violations, but the U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
First, Director of Public Prosecutions v Ziegler and Ors. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am by Andrew Hamm
Question: You write of Justice John Marshall Harlan’s famous solo dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
  It was Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, one of the five justices who voted in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 4:19 pm by The Law Blogger
Lots of Cameras; Lots of DataIn China, they say the "authorities" can identify anyone, in any public place, in seconds. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
The office of Inspector General Joseph V. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Evan Caminker
” So: “[T]hat was the Justice Department policy and those were the principles under which we operated. [read post]