Search for: "Public Defender Service Corporation, Inc."
Results 561 - 580
of 1,988
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2015, 9:17 am
The plaintiff was hit by a truck owned by Wal-Mart that was being driven by an employee at a corporate distribution center. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 3:50 pm
A fee or compensation is paid “in connection with or as a result of” such transaction or service if the fee or compensation would not have been paid but for the transaction or service or if eligibility for or the amount of the fee or compensation is based in whole or in part on the transaction or service. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 3:50 pm
A fee or compensation is paid “in connection with or as a result of” such transaction or service if the fee or compensation would not have been paid but for the transaction or service or if eligibility for or the amount of the fee or compensation is based in whole or in part on the transaction or service. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
To compel compliance with the no-deny prong of the policy, the Commission requires settling defendants to agree that they “will not take any action or make or permit to be made any public statement denying, directly or indirectly, any allegation in the complaint or creating the impression that the complaint is without factual basis” and also “will not make or permit to be made any public statement to the effect that Defendant does not admit the… [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:45 am
Roe, Harvard Law School, and Michael Tröge, ESCP-Europe, on Monday, May 16, 2016 Tags: Banks, Corporate debt, Debt, Debt-equity ratio, Equity capital, Financial crisis, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Incentives, Risk, Risk-taking, Systemic risk, Taxation Defending Director Discretion Posted by Eric Geringswald, Corporation Service Company, on Monday, May 16, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Derivative suits, Institutional Investors, Mutual… [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340, 361 (1991). [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
In practice many types of information society service provider (eg search engines) are not regarded as publishers at common law – see Metropolitan International Schools v Google Inc [2009] EMLR 27. [read post]
15 May 2020, 2:52 pm
They falsely claimed 99.9% accuracy and was ready for immediate deployment in each State via a corporate partner. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 12:08 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals had decided that the relators had adequately pled the materiality element of the False Claims Act under the standard set forth in Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 6:40 am
– Amgen, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:04 pm
For publication opinions today (5): In Daniel J. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
FLOWERS, INC., et al., Debtors. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 2:27 pm
Like other petitions for a writ of mandamus arising from the Western District of Texas, Juniper Networks, Inc. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:06 pm
(Mashpee, MA; Chance Reichel, President) Acorn Services, Inc. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 3:22 am
" .....We reiterated this theme in Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 10:01 pm
Other defendants named include: JMG Enterprises Inc. of Great Falls; Sysco Hampton Roads Inc. of Houston; Sysco VA LLC of Harrisonburg; Sysco Merchandising and Supply Chain Services Inc. of Houston; International Traders Inc. of Rocky Mount, NC; Patagonia Foods LLC of San Luis Obispo, CA; and VLM Foods USA Inc. of Plattsburgh, NY. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
Attorney's Off., 2018 NY Slip Op 00895, Appellate Division, First Department, a public officer may be entitled to claim absolute immunity as a defendant in a lawsuit under certain circumstances. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:39 am
Udeze also registered a Maryland company called E&T Consulting Inc., which he claimed was established to provide general services, among other things. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm
A good example of this is the Fisker, Inc. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
Appellants’ allegations of negligence did not assert that [defendant] undertook to “render services” to [plaintiff], therefore a charge on increased risk of harm was not appropriate. [read post]
