Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State" Results 561 - 580 of 5,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am by INFORRM
The fifth defendant relied on Jameel v Dow Jones and Co Inc ([2005] QB 946) for this point, since the same test used there for whether there was a real and substantial tort applied to the attempt to set aside permission for service. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
For the second time, the Supreme Court has summarily reversed a state high court ruling that upheld such a maneuver, this time in a case involving Arkansas’s refusal to place the name of a mother’s wife on a child’s birth certificate.Post-Obergefell ManeuveringOne set of post-Obergefell developments relate to weddings themselves, and the refusal by some vendors—bakeries, florists, photographers, and so on—to provide services for same-sex weddings… [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:26 am
Similarly, relying on Enhanced Network Solutions Group and Invidia, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma held that a former employee's public posts on his personal Facebook page did not constitute solicitation of his former co-workers under the terms of his non-solicitation agreement with his former employer in Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:01 am by Peter Mahler
Last month gave us three noteworthy post-trial decisions in three different cases from three different states, all centering on disputes among business co-owners over the ownership and exploitation of the businesses’s core intellectual property. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Numerous studies show that Chevron deference is currently the exception rather than the rule, and since 2001’s United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The starting point to defining a “professional service” is found in the principle expounded by Justice Kirby in GIO[12] which states that these are ‘‘services of a skilful character according to an established discipline”[13]. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 2:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
NYPPL recently received inquiries seeking a 2008 New York State Supreme Court decision that addressed the unilateral diminishing of retiree health insurance benefits by the retiree's former public employer. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 2:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
NYPPL recently received inquiries seeking a 2008 New York State Supreme Court decision that addressed the unilateral diminishing of retiree health insurance benefits by the retiree's former public employer. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:34 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Americans trying to predict how the Supreme Court will rule on King v. [read post]