Search for: "Quick v. Department of Justice"
Results 561 - 580
of 684
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2011, 1:48 am
Adams, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18 (11 May 2011) Miscarriage of justice compensation scheme too restrictive. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:46 am
In State v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:27 am
She added that the paper was due in a few days, so a quick response would be appreciated. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:57 am
Terra Sec v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:37 am
© 2011 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
Rather than prosecutor the prosecutors, the United States Department of Justice filed an amicus brief supporting them. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:12 pm
Arguing for the store chain in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
Justice? [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 10:19 am
The court explained that because many relators are interested in quick settlements, the government may be bound by res judicata before the Department of Justice is even aware of the suit. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 10:19 am
The court explained that because many relators are interested in quick settlements, the government may be bound by res judicata before the Department of Justice is even aware of the suit. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:41 pm
The stories of women involved in the case, Dukes v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:10 pm
The Obama Administration Department of Justice failed to fight this blatant violation of the intent of Congress.On top of all that, the Obama DoJ rescinded the already long overdue regulations and announced an intent to replace them. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:47 am
New York has successfully been doing this for almost 200 years for verdicts that are unreasonable, since Chief Judge James Kent wrote the following in Coleman v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:04 pm
By Daniel RichardsonZorn v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:58 pm
On the merits, this should be an easy call… By now, such blatant discrimination should be presumed to be unconstitutional, and the Justice Department should finally say so. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 1:11 am
Rasch, former head of the Justice Department's computer crime unit, pulled no punches in his reaction to the ruling. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:14 am
In the Wikileaks case, because Twitter followed its policies to notify users about requests for information prior to disclosure, the public now knows that the Justice Department is investigating Wikileaks. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 9:30 pm
Here is a quick roundup of human rights cases. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:08 am
Twp. of Fairfield, 198 N.J. 242, 264 (2009) (quoting Quick Chek Food Stores v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 9:17 pm
Other courts have felt directly bound in GPS cases by Knotts, and the Justice Department made that point when it asked the D.C. [read post]
