Search for: "R. B. vs B. T." Results 561 - 580 of 742
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm by Dorothy
MORGAN d/b/a SAINTS & SCHOLARS TATTOOS, Appellee. 2nd District.Insurance -- Automobile -- Appraisal -- Attorney's fees -- Where insurer demanded appraisal of stolen vehicle, and insured failed to comply with appraisal clause but filed suit prematurely, insured was not entitled to award of attorney's fees for that phase of trial court proceedings - [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am by Kelly
Global Global – General 33 (make that 38) intellectual property mistakes and how to avoid them (IP Think Tank) Don’t lose freedom of operation (no. 7 in our list of IP mistakes) (IP Think Tank) IPBC all set for San Francisco as preliminary programme is published for June 2011 (IAM) Global – Trade Marks / Brands Trade marks and brands ‘overlooked’ (IPKat) Nostalgic Brands: Can they be auctioned? [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
William Bounds, Ltd (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking plaintiff must meet rule 9(b) pleading for intent: Simonian v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
: (Class 46), ICANN on cost to end domain tasting: (Class 46), ICANN can’t – but can you? [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 9:25 am by David Harlow
  It therefore makes sense to place physician organizations at the center of ACOs; they don't provide all care to all members, but they do coordinate all care. [read post]
20 May 2009, 12:25 am
Posner observed that it is simply another manifestation of a common legal problem - that of rules vs. standards. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:27 am by Keith Mallinson
 It therefore recognises the need for SEP holders to be incentivised to continue to invest in R&D and their standardisation efforts.Unsurprisingly, the Communication significantly relies on Huawei vs. [read post]
12 May 2015, 4:42 pm
Federal vs. state court: Eramo sued in Virginia state court, but it seems likely that Rolling Stone and Erdely will want the case removed to federal court: The conventional wisdom is that libel defendants are procedurally better off in federal court, where it’s easier to get cases dismissed or narrowed before trial. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:59 am by Rob Robinson
  bit.ly/HzXpGZ (Joshua Engel) Communications with Unretained Experts, Unprotected by Rule 26(b)(B)(4)(C) – Any Exceptions? [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 7:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
For context, let me offer a recap of the past 14 months, with a couple flashbacks sprinkled in: In October 2019, the public comment hearings for the Group B codes were held. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm by Kelly
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog)  Global – Trade Marks / Brands Brand name vs. brand quality (IPBiz) Global – Patents Is it worth recording changes to PCT application information during the international phase? [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
(IP Spotlight) District Court Delaware: Infringement warrants permanent injunction but with 15-month ‘sunset provision’ to allow defendant time to introduce noninfringing product: B. [read post]