Search for: "RIDER v. STATE"
Results 561 - 580
of 784
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2015, 6:20 am
The plaintiff’s state law claims also failed (Goldberg v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 12:04 pm
In Connecticut v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
In 2011, the state Supreme Court of Washington ruled in State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 2:50 pm
Bradwell v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 2:43 pm
(hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 3:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 8:04 am
Lamensdorf v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:56 am
The case, Aslam v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Janet Kowal v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:05 pm
The department received 75 applications and selected 40 (including the sergeant), to participate in horse and rider evaluations. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:40 am
The Supreme Court has already directly borrowed this principle in analyzing the scope of congressional contempt power, stating in Anderson v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 7:58 am
” Additionally, the major gifts rider to the power authorized the agent to establish and fund revocable or irrevocable trusts, transfer assets to a trust, make gifts and act as grantor and trustee. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 7:58 am
” Additionally, the major gifts rider to the power authorized the agent to establish and fund revocable or irrevocable trusts, transfer assets to a trust, make gifts and act as grantor and trustee. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
Singh v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:39 pm
See Seitz v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:31 pm
A majority of the Justices joined in the critique, most strongly expressed in 2014 in Harris v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am
Edwards Lifesciences AG v Cook Biotech Incorporated (IPKat) England’s new shirt sponsors? [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm
U.S. asylum officers are in the main dedicated and capable, but judicial review of asylum decisions at the U.S. border is exceedingly limited—limits that the Supreme Court upheld on June 25 in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 12:00 am
Vermont’s legislation on the mandatory labelling of GE foods is facing a federal court challenge; a number of consumer class actions on ‘natural’ labelled GE foods are in state courts; FDA recently solicited comments on the use of the term natural in labelling GE foods (more on that in my next post); and the appropriations bill that Congress just released did not contain a hotly contested rider to preempt state GE labelling laws. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 9:35 am
This year, Operation Hurricane thrust state surveillance into the digital age to the forefront of Chilean public opinion. [read post]